| 한글 OX 문제 수 1포인트/5문제,1지문 | 5 |
| 영어 OX 문제 수 1포인트/5문제,1지문 | 5 |
| 영한 해석 적기 문제 수 1포인트/5문제,1지문 | 5 |
| 스크램블 문제 수 2포인트/5문제,1지문 | 5 |
| 단어 뜻 적기 문제 수 1포인트/10문제,1지문 | 10 |
| 내용 이해 질문 문제 수 1포인트/5문제,1지문 | 3 |
| 지문 요약 적기 문제 수 2포인트/5문제,1지문 | 1 |
| 반복 생성 시험지 세트 수 | 1 |
| PDF 출력 설정 |
|---|
| # | 영어 지문 | 지문 출처 |
|---|---|---|
| 지문 1 |
In today's digital world, millions of people use social media every day to share opinions, read news, and connect with others.↵
While these platforms provide many benefits, they also spread false information quickly.↵ This has raised a serious question: Should social media companies be held responsible for the misinformation shared on their platforms?↵ Many experts and citizens believe the answer is yes.↵ ↵ First, misinformation can cause real harm.↵ False claims about health, for example, have led some people to avoid vaccines or take unsafe treatments.↵ Fake news stories about politics can influence elections or increase public distrust in government.↵ When false information spreads faster than facts, the public's ability to make informed decisions is damaged.↵ If social media companies allow harmful misinformation to stay online, they play a role in the damage it causes.↵ ↵ Some argue that holding platforms responsible would threaten freedom of speech.↵ However, free speech does not mean speech without consequences.↵ Just as newspapers cannot publish lies without facing legal action, social media companies should also face consequences when they allow harmful falsehoods to spread.↵ Creating systems to check facts, flag false posts, or remove dangerous content is not censorship—it is responsible management.↵ ↵ In recent years, some platforms have taken steps to limit misinformation.↵ They have added warning labels, removed false content, and promoted reliable sources.↵ However, these actions are not always consistent or strong enough.↵ Because these companies make money from user engagement, they may not be motivated to reduce content that gets lots of attention—even if it's false.↵ ↵ Therefore, governments may need to step in.↵ Laws that require platforms to take faster action against misinformation could help protect the public.↵ At the same time, education is key.↵ Teaching people how to recognize false information and think critically about what they read can reduce the power of misinformation.↵ ↵ In conclusion, social media platforms should be responsible for limiting the spread of harmful misinformation.↵ This is not just a matter of technology—it is a matter of public safety, trust, and truth. |
Should Social Media Platforms Be Responsible for Misinformation?
|
| 해석 | 스크램블 | 문장 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 지문 1 | 1. | ✅ | ✅ | In today's digital world, millions of people use social media every day to share opinions, read news, and connect with others. |
| 2. | ✅ | ✅ | While these platforms provide many benefits, they also spread false information quickly. | |
| 3. | ✅ | ✅ | This has raised a serious question: Should social media companies be held responsible for the misinformation shared on their platforms? | |
| 4. | ✅ | ✅ | Many experts and citizens believe the answer is yes. | |
| 5. | ✅ | ✅ | First, misinformation can cause real harm. | |
| 6. | ✅ | ✅ | False claims about health, for example, have led some people to avoid vaccines or take unsafe treatments. | |
| 7. | ✅ | ✅ | Fake news stories about politics can influence elections or increase public distrust in government. | |
| 8. | ✅ | ✅ | When false information spreads faster than facts, the public's ability to make informed decisions is damaged. | |
| 9. | ✅ | ✅ | If social media companies allow harmful misinformation to stay online, they play a role in the damage it causes. | |
| 10. | ✅ | ✅ | Some argue that holding platforms responsible would threaten freedom of speech. | |
| 11. | ✅ | ✅ | However, free speech does not mean speech without consequences. | |
| 12. | ✅ | ✅ | Just as newspapers cannot publish lies without facing legal action, social media companies should also face consequences when they allow harmful falsehoods to spread. | |
| 13. | ✅ | ✅ | Creating systems to check facts, flag false posts, or remove dangerous content is not censorship—it is responsible management. | |
| 14. | ✅ | ✅ | In recent years, some platforms have taken steps to limit misinformation. | |
| 15. | ✅ | ✅ | They have added warning labels, removed false content, and promoted reliable sources. | |
| 16. | ✅ | ✅ | However, these actions are not always consistent or strong enough. | |
| 17. | ✅ | ✅ | Because these companies make money from user engagement, they may not be motivated to reduce content that gets lots of attention—even if it's false. | |
| 18. | ✅ | ✅ | Therefore, governments may need to step in. | |
| 19. | ✅ | ✅ | Laws that require platforms to take faster action against misinformation could help protect the public. | |
| 20. | ✅ | ✅ | At the same time, education is key. | |
| 21. | ✅ | ✅ | Teaching people how to recognize false information and think critically about what they read can reduce the power of misinformation. | |
| 22. | ✅ | ✅ | In conclusion, social media platforms should be responsible for limiting the spread of harmful misinformation. | |
| 23. | ✅ | ✅ | This is not just a matter of technology—it is a matter of public safety, trust, and truth. |